WSJ читает нас

Не прошло и двух дней (или как раз два дня и прошло?) как Wall Street Journal подрезал нашу идею про Трампа, как крышу для американского народа -- "Trump and the Rise of the Unprotected: Why political professionals are struggling to make sense of the world they created".

Поскольку оригинал за paywall'ом, процитирую на грани полного копипаста:
But I keep thinking of how Donald Trump got to be the very likely Republican nominee. There are many answers and reasons, but my thoughts keep revolving around the idea of protection.  
<...> 
There are the protected and the unprotected. The protected make public policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push back, powerfully. 
The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created. Again, they make public policy and have for some time. 
They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them, or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in the European Union—literally have their own security details.
Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything, impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own decisions. 
<...> 
Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally.
It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that they were not looking out for the country, either.
The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance.
Mr. Trump came from that. 
<...> 
In wise governments the top is attentive to the realities of the lives of normal people, and careful about their anxieties. That’s more or less how America used to be. There didn’t seem to be so much distance between the top and the bottom.
Now is seems the attitude of the top half is: You’re on your own. Get with the program, little racist.
...но старая крыша кормовую базу без боя не отдаст, и поэтому появляются вот такие замечательные образцы контр-пропаганды. 

Блестяще сделано (c точки зрения старой крыши), без иронии говорю, посмотрите целиком. Концовка, с финальной цитатой - так просто ах.  

Но не поможет. 

Я вчера смотрел прямой эфир Donald Trump Rally in Fort Worth, и это интересный политический документ сам по себе, но последние 10 минут (c 00:40) -- выдающиеся. Краткий пересказ, для тех кому лень смотреть:  Трамп пригласил на сцену какого-то щуплого пастора, тот выступил с коротким спичем, закончив телегу словами "If Donald Trump is elected President as USA, we, Evengelical Christians, will have a true friend in a White House". 
После чего Трамп забирает микрофон и объясняет и без того уже расколбашенной аудитории, что "christianity is under siege, every year it gets wicker, and wicker and wicker", но эта атака на христиан закончится с началом его президенства. В стране 250 миллионов христиан, и "we gonna say "Merry Christmas" on Christmas. We gonna start going to department stores, and the huge "MERRY CHRISTMAS" signs will be everywhere!". 

Аудитория в экстазе. 

А вы говорите -- фашизм. 

Ну, может и фашизм, ну и что теперь. 

Люди счастливы зато, это ли не цель демократической политики. :)

2 comments:

  1. эээ, а куда лайки ставить, а?

    ReplyDelete
  2. А вот про панику в рядах республиканцев в связи с трамповскими успехами. "Inside the Republican Party’s Desperate Mission to Stop Donald Trump" http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-party.html?_r=0

    ReplyDelete